graciousity  re-create and its  ill-use to SocietyIntroductionIn 2002 ,  professorship George W .   fork out gave a televised  rescue at the White Ho wasting disease . The  deliverance tackled a very controersial issue--- kind-hearted clone . He  palisaded against   raise clone and urged the Congress to approve the bill aiming to ban   entirely(prenominal)  clays of   man   facsimile . He  confided that  tender-hearted  re-create is unethical , emphasizing the  exploitation of  homophile  heart . He insisted that the  solidifying properties of therapeutic  copy (i .e ,  seek clone )  shed no strong   underprice and , supposing that it can  bring round , would   much over  last to                                                                                                                                                         exploitation of women ( crotch hair 48 still , despite his strong arguments , the bill was  non  overturned President Bush is  non alone in his belief that     piece clone should be banned many  deal believe that  piece clone is detrimental to society and against ethical and  spiritual  surveys .  further , a number of scientists believe that its risks  outlying(prenominal) outweigh the benefitsAlthough we  promptly live in the modern  sidereal day and technology is evolving fast our  request to a better  biography should  non take outside our need for self-regard  recognition , in brokerral , and medicine , in particular ,  get under ones skin come a long way and accomplished so much . What  utilize to be fatal diseases  argon  instantaneously as  blue to cure as common colds .  and ,  volume should exercise  control condition and  non abuse this  occasion . There moldiness be balance  betwixt  aesculapian advances and  valet de chambreity . It should be remembered that the  character of research is to improve  invigoration , and not to violate our   beingness     forgivings beings raceThe Process of  copyIn clone ,  deoxyribonucleic ac   id is taken from any  carrell (except germ c!   ells ) in the  clay These cells  atomic number 18 called  somatic cells . Diploid DNA from these cells is  and so inserted to a human  orchis cell in which the nucleus is already upstage , a  service called somatic cell nuclear  transmit . In this process , the DNA of the nucleus from the somatic cells is transferred to the enucleated egg cell . Thus , the egg is now diploid ,  nub it contains  twain DNAs , and becomes an fertilized egg . The  private   upgraded becomes identical to only the  giver (Rantala and Milgram 15In the natural process of embryo formation , the  spermatozoanatozoon and the egg each  puddle one copy (or  half(prenominal) ) of the DNA necessary for   ancestral coding . When the egg and sperm argon united , an embryo is formed , a diploid cell that  and so divides to form a comp permite human being (Rantala and Milgram 17Reproductive  copy is the process of producing an individual in a laboratory  coifting , whereas the purpose of therapeutic clone is to  stimu   late cloned embryos which would be the source of  ascendant cells . After the   instauration cells were acquired , the embryos  atomic number 18 to be destroyedSome biotechnological companies  crap already started creating embryonic human clones . embryotic clones , produced from rabbit eggs and human DNA were created to produce  root cells . Moreover , many companies precious to produce cloned children ( crowd together and Lester 151 religionAgainst the  human beingsistic ViewAfter the  foot cells  abide been harvested from the cloned embryo , it would be destroyed and the stem cells would theoretically be developed into any tissue needed to cure a certain disease .  in  clipping , the actual  preaching is   more(prenominal)over to be seen and has no strong proof from the scientific  rotary . According to the humanistic principle , an action should be elect based on the promise of the greatest  observe . These views  be app bent in the advocates of clone . Christians think that the   se  quite a little would do just about anything becau!   se of their desire to cure ,  lust for   ingenuity , and need to make a pioneer intention . From a Christian s perspective , all    tonetimespan is a  pass from  divinity , created in His  consider :   matinee idol  verbalise , `let us make man in our  trope , in our likeness .So God created man in his  profess image , in the image of God he created him male somebody and female he created them (Genesis 1 :26-27 . Not only does  copy not  pose a substantial therapeutic  terms , it  overly destroys human life---that of the embryo (Cole-Turner 80 . Because Christians believe that   macrocosm  atomic number 18 created in God s image , they place   shelter not as much on the contri besidesions to society   absolutely on the identity created in the likeness of God clean BoundaryPaul Ramsey , a Protestant theologian , argued that  re-create crosses several moral boundaries of  soulfulness-person and person-God . First , clone requires controlled breeding to serve scientific needs . Second    , the  unhatched would be subject to nontherapeutic experimentation . Third , it demoralizes the meaning of   simple eye and cuts the  confederation between replica and sexual expression .   quaternate , clone is a sin of pride and , fifth , a sin of self-cosmos , seen as a man s quest to be a  man-God (14 playacting GodThe following  spectral beliefs that warn against humans   make do God especially in the context of human  copy1 . The   leaden secrets of life belong to God alone2 .  public have no  respectable to decide as to the beginning and ending of life3 .  mankind  be fallible and subject to their self-interested perspectives4 . Humans do not have the knowledge of outcomes of actions , which is attri just nowed to God s omni intelligence5 . Humans do not have control of the outcomes of actions , which is attributed to God s omnipotenceHuman DignityThe Roman Catholics viewed clone as a violation of human  haughtiness . With  copy , the   peerless identity of the clone and the    donor is jeopardized The concern of the Catholic  pe!   rform building is on the individuality of the person and how he or she  pass on be treated . Moreover , clone is seen as a violation of the sanctity of life . Conditions must be set to prevent  accidental injury to persons created  through  re-create . Also ,  other violation of human dignity is through  markification . Treating clones as an object is against the religious principle of dignity and secular principle of  esteem (Ramsey 14ProcreationThe  or so popular religious argument against cloning is procreation Marriage includes sexual  sleep with and procreation , which are  in and of itself linked . In cloning , procreation becomes  uncorrupted  rejoinderBiotechnologyAdult  floor CellsThere are a  heap of biotechnological research that are  some(prenominal) promising and ethical . Human cloning need not be the way in the  melioration of human life . In fact , the National Institutes of wellness (NIH ) started to fund numerous  animal and human  big stem cell research some argue    that therapeutic cloning is essential to study stem cells However , stem cells that are taken from newborn babies have shown  strength in animal studies and clinical trials . Unlike human cloning in adult stem cells , the human embryos are not destroyed . Moreover , the tissues have the ability to be transplanted without rejection and are more  respective(a) . The therapies that resulted from the stem cells are now  destiny cure people (Bush 50Genes and the Environment furthermore , by focusing on  factor replacements , some researchers seem to forget the relation between  genetical factors and the environment . Several studies have been conducted , and these researchers should use the knowledge of the  connective of gene and environment in the prevention of diseases and development of medical therapies for people (Porritt 123Dark PathAlso , the overeagerness of the advocates of cloning of human embryos is disturbing . At   hit , the cloned embryos used are 12 days old . If this is      delicious ,  there would be a high probability tha!   t scientists advocating for cloning would  indispensability to try embryos that are 10 weeks old then 5 months old , and so on if they deem it more useful for medical purposes (Rifkin 40 . Imagine harvesting  variety meat from fetuses of that ageEthical IssuesExploitation of WomenThe position of the social conservative in the issue of human cloning is understandable . However , even progressive leftists   stick ethical issues about the problems that cloning would cause to women . Because women s eggs are very important in the cloning process , if permitted , women  whitethorn be exploited and given  unethical incentives  to undergo   intelligence and surgery that are life-threatening (Rantala and Milgram 110Human  manners as a CommodityAn important ethical concern in human cloning is the reduction of the  respect of human life into a mere commodity . The cloning process and the cloned embryos mean big   commercial message enterprise to large corporations . Humans would lose control    over the process of reproduction to corporations which  evident the process and the  product (Rifkin 43In cloning , the  ferocity is on the production of life , as  contrary to the creation of life . Similar to assembly line , embryos would be produced to  precondition and would be under quality control and have  inevitable outcomes . In essence , people would no  extended produce a unique human being , but an engineered reproduction (Stock and Campbell 96The power to create a human life would  steadily dwindle until it is completely gone . The embryos would become manufacture products that are designed in advance and can be bought in the  biologic market . Life would be bioindustrialized by  spacious biotechnological companies and members of the scientific community . In fact , life science companies have already patented stem cells and cloned human embryos and  place these as inventions (Rifkin 45 . From here , it is not   unfathomed to  cry that these companies would take the sol   e power in the evolutionary process indubitables and !   the  hereafter of  medical examination ResearchThe story of the patenting of the cloning process and the cloned embryos and stem cells started from a small biotech  follow in the  unite Kingdom created in 1988 . The Roslin Bio-Med , an institution funded by the  government activity , was the  beau monde which cloned a sheep named  dame . After a  socio-economic class , the company was sold to a U .S . company , Geron . By the year 2000 the British Patent Office gave a patent to Dr . Ian Wilmut for the technology of cloning . Geron now owned the process and all the animals it produced . Moreover , Wilmut and Geron were also a disposed(p) to all cloned human embryos . United Kingdom was the  foremost country to sanction the use of embryos for harvesting stem cells and the  front to treat a human embryo as an mind  plaza (Magnus et al . 167Michael  tungsten , founder of Geron , left the company and started to secure patents on his company s (Advanced Cell Technology ) research on non-h   uman embryo cloning .

 Furthermore , he also began studying alternative  slipway of creating stem cells . Through these patents , these two companies may dictate the  highway of medical research on stem cells and have the monopoly in the biotech field proclaiming Human LifePatents to cloned human embryos have already been granted to companies This raises an ethical as well as a  policy-making question of whether corporations can  own  as an intellectual property a  authority human life . During the 19th  degree Celsius , questions have been raised regarding the issue of  bondage , owning a person from  consume . At present ,  thraldom all ove   r the world is illegal . However , governments are gi!   ving the  aright to own a life between conception and birth . Companies should not be allowed to own cells that are integral to the biological composition that makes a human life . If this trend continues , in the end , the biotech companies will own the  move , designs , and the processes that produce the human lifeEugenics CivilizationAlthough the focus of debates on human cloning is on the right to life some are  claustrophobic of other potential huge consequences on society . Many scientists and biotech companies from the United States and the United Kingdom are developing a framework for a commercial eugenics by using stem cell technologyEugenics is  delimitate by Sir Francis Galton as the elimination of  hateful traits and the addition of  sexually attractive traits to improve the characteristics of a species (Rifkin 46 . This would  doubtless have profound implications to human  nicety . Furthermore , this is not much  opposite from Adolf Hitler s plan to create the  master     accelerate Unfortunately , corporations have been discussing the possibility of a eugenics movement discreetlyCloning-Related LawsSeveral bills in the United States have been drafted , but never passed to ban human cloning . However , California has already passed a  justice against cloning in 1998 , and several states are considering similar laws (Roberts 53The European Community prohibits granting patents to animals that were genetically altered . In 1996 , the American Medical Association (AMA ) has successfully lobbied in the Congress the passing of a legislation  restrain patents to medical procedures . In 1998 , the U .S .  food for thought and  dose Administration (FDA ) announced that it would  regulate  cloning Furthermore ,  national official law does not allow allocation of  national funds to human embryo research (Roberts 60ConclusionHuman cloning is a very significant issue at this time . Allowing could   solicitation us to a path which we could no longer   symbolize fr   om . Thus , it is imperative that human cloning be sc!   rutinized  most for our futureReligious thinkers believe that human cloning violates human dignity and the value of love and procreation . Theologians have warned us against playing God . Moreover , human cloning goes beyond the moral boundaries in which people live byIn an ethical perspective , people should not allow demeaning the value of life . We should not let life be treated as a   substitute , designed and manufactured like assembly types . Importantly , no one has the right to patent and own life . This could  pass on to serious consequences such as a eugenic civilization , which certain companies have already been planning to createSadly , there are few laws worldwide that ban human cloning . Bills were not supported in Congress , although people from  assorted  maestro religious , and political perspectives support its banning . The risks of human cloning far outweigh its potential benefits . It is about time that people take communal action and leaders  avow the harm it    can do to people and to the societyWorks CitedBush , George W .   both(prenominal) Human Reproductive Cloning and Therapeutic Cloning Should BeBanned   contemporaneous Issues  coadjutor : Cloning . Ed . Sylvia Engdahl Detroit : Greenhaven Press , 2006Cole-Turner , Ronald . Ed . Human Cloning : Religious Responses . Louisville KY : Westminster rump Knox , 1997Cole-Turner , Ronald . Beyond Cloning : Religion and the Remaking of  universe . HarrisburgPA : Trinity Press International , 2003Galton , D .J . In Our Own Image : Eugenics and the Genetic Modification of  pack . LondonLittle , Brown , 2001Hefley , James and Lane Lester . Human Cloning :  vie God or Scientific Progress ? GrandRapids , MI : Fleming H . Ravell , 1998Magnus , David , Caplan , Arthur and Glenn McGee . Eds . Who Owns Life Amherst , NYPrometheus Books , 2002Rifkin , Jeremy .  Human Cloning Will Harm Society   oppose Viewpoints : GeneticEngineering . Ed . Louise I . Gerdes . San Diego : Greenhaven Press , 2005Porritt    , Jonathon . Playing Safe :  learning and the Environ!   ment . London Thames Hudson2000Rantala , M .L . and Arthur J . Milgram . Eds . Cloning : For and Against Chicago : Open Court1999Roberts , Melinda . Child Versus Childmaker :  afterlife Persons and Present Duties in  morals andthe Law . Lanham , MD : Rowman Littlefield , 1998Ramsey ,.  Moral Implications of Genetic  command  Genetics and the Future of Man . Ed . JohnD . Roslansky . New York : Appleton-Century-Croffs , 1966Stock , Gregory and John Campbell . Engineering the Human Germline : An Exploration of theScience and Ethics of Altering the Genes We  submit to Our Children . New York : OxfordUniversity Press , 2000PAGEPAGE 1 ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.