Sunday, October 6, 2013

Should Human Cloning Be Banned Or It Should Be Permitted?

graciousity re-create and its ill-use to SocietyIntroductionIn 2002 , professorship George W . fork out gave a televised rescue at the White Ho wasting disease . The deliverance tackled a very controersial issue--- kind-hearted clone . He palisaded against raise clone and urged the Congress to approve the bill aiming to ban entirely(prenominal) clays of man facsimile . He confided that tender-hearted re-create is unethical , emphasizing the exploitation of homophile heart . He insisted that the solidifying properties of therapeutic copy (i .e , seek clone ) shed no strong underprice and , supposing that it can bring round , would much over last to exploitation of women ( crotch hair 48 still , despite his strong arguments , the bill was non overturned President Bush is non alone in his belief that piece clone should be banned many deal believe that piece clone is detrimental to society and against ethical and spiritual surveys . further , a number of scientists believe that its risks outlying(prenominal) outweigh the benefitsAlthough we promptly live in the modern sidereal day and technology is evolving fast our request to a better biography should non take outside our need for self-regard recognition , in brokerral , and medicine , in particular , get under ones skin come a long way and accomplished so much . What utilize to be fatal diseases argon instantaneously as blue to cure as common colds . and , volume should exercise control condition and non abuse this occasion . There moldiness be balance betwixt aesculapian advances and valet de chambreity . It should be remembered that the character of research is to improve invigoration , and not to violate our beingness forgivings beings raceThe Process of copyIn clone , deoxyribonucleic ac id is taken from any carrell (except germ c! ells ) in the clay These cells atomic number 18 called somatic cells . Diploid DNA from these cells is and so inserted to a human orchis cell in which the nucleus is already upstage , a service called somatic cell nuclear transmit . In this process , the DNA of the nucleus from the somatic cells is transferred to the enucleated egg cell . Thus , the egg is now diploid , nub it contains twain DNAs , and becomes an fertilized egg . The private upgraded becomes identical to only the giver (Rantala and Milgram 15In the natural process of embryo formation , the spermatozoanatozoon and the egg each puddle one copy (or half(prenominal) ) of the DNA necessary for ancestral coding . When the egg and sperm argon united , an embryo is formed , a diploid cell that and so divides to form a comp permite human being (Rantala and Milgram 17Reproductive copy is the process of producing an individual in a laboratory coifting , whereas the purpose of therapeutic clone is to stimu late cloned embryos which would be the source of ascendant cells . After the instauration cells were acquired , the embryos atomic number 18 to be destroyedSome biotechnological companies crap already started creating embryonic human clones . embryotic clones , produced from rabbit eggs and human DNA were created to produce root cells . Moreover , many companies precious to produce cloned children ( crowd together and Lester 151 religionAgainst the human beingsistic ViewAfter the foot cells abide been harvested from the cloned embryo , it would be destroyed and the stem cells would theoretically be developed into any tissue needed to cure a certain disease . in clipping , the actual preaching is more(prenominal)over to be seen and has no strong proof from the scientific rotary . According to the humanistic principle , an action should be elect based on the promise of the greatest observe . These views be app bent in the advocates of clone . Christians think that the se quite a little would do just about anything becau! se of their desire to cure , lust for ingenuity , and need to make a pioneer intention . From a Christian s perspective , all tonetimespan is a pass from divinity , created in His consider : matinee idol verbalise , `let us make man in our trope , in our likeness .So God created man in his profess image , in the image of God he created him male somebody and female he created them (Genesis 1 :26-27 . Not only does copy not pose a substantial therapeutic terms , it overly destroys human life---that of the embryo (Cole-Turner 80 . Because Christians believe that macrocosm atomic number 18 created in God s image , they place shelter not as much on the contri besidesions to society absolutely on the identity created in the likeness of God clean BoundaryPaul Ramsey , a Protestant theologian , argued that re-create crosses several moral boundaries of soulfulness-person and person-God . First , clone requires controlled breeding to serve scientific needs . Second , the unhatched would be subject to nontherapeutic experimentation . Third , it demoralizes the meaning of simple eye and cuts the confederation between replica and sexual expression . quaternate , clone is a sin of pride and , fifth , a sin of self-cosmos , seen as a man s quest to be a man-God (14 playacting GodThe following spectral beliefs that warn against humans make do God especially in the context of human copy1 . The leaden secrets of life belong to God alone2 . public have no respectable to decide as to the beginning and ending of life3 . mankind be fallible and subject to their self-interested perspectives4 . Humans do not have the knowledge of outcomes of actions , which is attri just nowed to God s omni intelligence5 . Humans do not have control of the outcomes of actions , which is attributed to God s omnipotenceHuman DignityThe Roman Catholics viewed clone as a violation of human haughtiness . With copy , the peerless identity of the clone and the donor is jeopardized The concern of the Catholic pe! rform building is on the individuality of the person and how he or she pass on be treated . Moreover , clone is seen as a violation of the sanctity of life . Conditions must be set to prevent accidental injury to persons created through re-create . Also , other violation of human dignity is through markification . Treating clones as an object is against the religious principle of dignity and secular principle of esteem (Ramsey 14ProcreationThe or so popular religious argument against cloning is procreation Marriage includes sexual sleep with and procreation , which are in and of itself linked . In cloning , procreation becomes uncorrupted rejoinderBiotechnologyAdult floor CellsThere are a heap of biotechnological research that are some(prenominal) promising and ethical . Human cloning need not be the way in the melioration of human life . In fact , the National Institutes of wellness (NIH ) started to fund numerous animal and human big stem cell research some argue that therapeutic cloning is essential to study stem cells However , stem cells that are taken from newborn babies have shown strength in animal studies and clinical trials . Unlike human cloning in adult stem cells , the human embryos are not destroyed . Moreover , the tissues have the ability to be transplanted without rejection and are more respective(a) . The therapies that resulted from the stem cells are now destiny cure people (Bush 50Genes and the Environment furthermore , by focusing on factor replacements , some researchers seem to forget the relation between genetical factors and the environment . Several studies have been conducted , and these researchers should use the knowledge of the connective of gene and environment in the prevention of diseases and development of medical therapies for people (Porritt 123Dark PathAlso , the overeagerness of the advocates of cloning of human embryos is disturbing . At hit , the cloned embryos used are 12 days old . If this is delicious , there would be a high probability tha! t scientists advocating for cloning would indispensability to try embryos that are 10 weeks old then 5 months old , and so on if they deem it more useful for medical purposes (Rifkin 40 . Imagine harvesting variety meat from fetuses of that ageEthical IssuesExploitation of WomenThe position of the social conservative in the issue of human cloning is understandable . However , even progressive leftists stick ethical issues about the problems that cloning would cause to women . Because women s eggs are very important in the cloning process , if permitted , women whitethorn be exploited and given unethical incentives to undergo intelligence and surgery that are life-threatening (Rantala and Milgram 110Human manners as a CommodityAn important ethical concern in human cloning is the reduction of the respect of human life into a mere commodity . The cloning process and the cloned embryos mean big commercial message enterprise to large corporations . Humans would lose control over the process of reproduction to corporations which evident the process and the product (Rifkin 43In cloning , the ferocity is on the production of life , as contrary to the creation of life . Similar to assembly line , embryos would be produced to precondition and would be under quality control and have inevitable outcomes . In essence , people would no extended produce a unique human being , but an engineered reproduction (Stock and Campbell 96The power to create a human life would steadily dwindle until it is completely gone . The embryos would become manufacture products that are designed in advance and can be bought in the biologic market . Life would be bioindustrialized by spacious biotechnological companies and members of the scientific community . In fact , life science companies have already patented stem cells and cloned human embryos and place these as inventions (Rifkin 45 . From here , it is not unfathomed to cry that these companies would take the sol e power in the evolutionary process indubitables and ! the hereafter of medical examination ResearchThe story of the patenting of the cloning process and the cloned embryos and stem cells started from a small biotech follow in the unite Kingdom created in 1988 . The Roslin Bio-Med , an institution funded by the government activity , was the beau monde which cloned a sheep named dame . After a socio-economic class , the company was sold to a U .S . company , Geron . By the year 2000 the British Patent Office gave a patent to Dr . Ian Wilmut for the technology of cloning . Geron now owned the process and all the animals it produced . Moreover , Wilmut and Geron were also a disposed(p) to all cloned human embryos . United Kingdom was the foremost country to sanction the use of embryos for harvesting stem cells and the front to treat a human embryo as an mind plaza (Magnus et al . 167Michael tungsten , founder of Geron , left the company and started to secure patents on his company s (Advanced Cell Technology ) research on non-h uman embryo cloning .
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Furthermore , he also began studying alternative slipway of creating stem cells . Through these patents , these two companies may dictate the highway of medical research on stem cells and have the monopoly in the biotech field proclaiming Human LifePatents to cloned human embryos have already been granted to companies This raises an ethical as well as a policy-making question of whether corporations can own as an intellectual property a authority human life . During the 19th degree Celsius , questions have been raised regarding the issue of bondage , owning a person from consume . At present , thraldom all ove r the world is illegal . However , governments are gi! ving the aright to own a life between conception and birth . Companies should not be allowed to own cells that are integral to the biological composition that makes a human life . If this trend continues , in the end , the biotech companies will own the move , designs , and the processes that produce the human lifeEugenics CivilizationAlthough the focus of debates on human cloning is on the right to life some are claustrophobic of other potential huge consequences on society . Many scientists and biotech companies from the United States and the United Kingdom are developing a framework for a commercial eugenics by using stem cell technologyEugenics is delimitate by Sir Francis Galton as the elimination of hateful traits and the addition of sexually attractive traits to improve the characteristics of a species (Rifkin 46 . This would doubtless have profound implications to human nicety . Furthermore , this is not much opposite from Adolf Hitler s plan to create the master accelerate Unfortunately , corporations have been discussing the possibility of a eugenics movement discreetlyCloning-Related LawsSeveral bills in the United States have been drafted , but never passed to ban human cloning . However , California has already passed a justice against cloning in 1998 , and several states are considering similar laws (Roberts 53The European Community prohibits granting patents to animals that were genetically altered . In 1996 , the American Medical Association (AMA ) has successfully lobbied in the Congress the passing of a legislation restrain patents to medical procedures . In 1998 , the U .S . food for thought and dose Administration (FDA ) announced that it would regulate cloning Furthermore , national official law does not allow allocation of national funds to human embryo research (Roberts 60ConclusionHuman cloning is a very significant issue at this time . Allowing could solicitation us to a path which we could no longer symbolize fr om . Thus , it is imperative that human cloning be sc! rutinized most for our futureReligious thinkers believe that human cloning violates human dignity and the value of love and procreation . Theologians have warned us against playing God . Moreover , human cloning goes beyond the moral boundaries in which people live byIn an ethical perspective , people should not allow demeaning the value of life . We should not let life be treated as a substitute , designed and manufactured like assembly types . Importantly , no one has the right to patent and own life . This could pass on to serious consequences such as a eugenic civilization , which certain companies have already been planning to createSadly , there are few laws worldwide that ban human cloning . Bills were not supported in Congress , although people from assorted maestro religious , and political perspectives support its banning . The risks of human cloning far outweigh its potential benefits . It is about time that people take communal action and leaders avow the harm it can do to people and to the societyWorks CitedBush , George W . both(prenominal) Human Reproductive Cloning and Therapeutic Cloning Should BeBanned contemporaneous Issues coadjutor : Cloning . Ed . Sylvia Engdahl Detroit : Greenhaven Press , 2006Cole-Turner , Ronald . Ed . Human Cloning : Religious Responses . Louisville KY : Westminster rump Knox , 1997Cole-Turner , Ronald . Beyond Cloning : Religion and the Remaking of universe . HarrisburgPA : Trinity Press International , 2003Galton , D .J . In Our Own Image : Eugenics and the Genetic Modification of pack . LondonLittle , Brown , 2001Hefley , James and Lane Lester . Human Cloning : vie God or Scientific Progress ? GrandRapids , MI : Fleming H . Ravell , 1998Magnus , David , Caplan , Arthur and Glenn McGee . Eds . Who Owns Life Amherst , NYPrometheus Books , 2002Rifkin , Jeremy . Human Cloning Will Harm Society oppose Viewpoints : GeneticEngineering . Ed . Louise I . Gerdes . San Diego : Greenhaven Press , 2005Porritt , Jonathon . Playing Safe : learning and the Environ! ment . London Thames Hudson2000Rantala , M .L . and Arthur J . Milgram . Eds . Cloning : For and Against Chicago : Open Court1999Roberts , Melinda . Child Versus Childmaker : afterlife Persons and Present Duties in morals andthe Law . Lanham , MD : Rowman Littlefield , 1998Ramsey ,. Moral Implications of Genetic command Genetics and the Future of Man . Ed . JohnD . Roslansky . New York : Appleton-Century-Croffs , 1966Stock , Gregory and John Campbell . Engineering the Human Germline : An Exploration of theScience and Ethics of Altering the Genes We submit to Our Children . New York : OxfordUniversity Press , 2000PAGEPAGE 1 ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.